Monstro Bizarro

Monstro Bizarro: The Beast of Brooklyn Bridge

on July 29, 2012 | 3 Comments

When a beastly looking carcass washed ashore on New York’s East River several days ago, it quickly grabbed the attention of locals.  The strange animal, pictured below, was discovered by resident Denise Ginley as it lay dead on the sand near the Brooklyn Bridge.  Hairless, bloated, and looking like it had a rough time on the high seas, the creature inevitably brought back memories of the famed “Montauk Monster,” a similar beast found on a beach near Montauk, New York in July 2008.

Even though speculation still runs rampant, the so-called Montauk Monster turned out to be a bloated raccoon carcass.  The “Beast of Brooklyn Bridge,” however, doesn’t appear to be a raccoon.  Original conjecture pegged the beast as a cooked pig, but experts – including Jeremy Wade of River Monsters fame (RM #122) – have ruled that out.  According to Gothamist, who first published the photos, Cornell University’s naturalist professor Paul Curtis speculated that “this was likely a small dog that drowned and has been floating in the river for quite a while.”

Whatever the case, I’m sure the beast’s legend will continue to grow as wild theories of government science experiments gone awry and dog-beasts from outer space start to propagate the Internet.  Or perhaps it’s just a common Chupacabra who left Texas in search of some New York nightlife.  With the heat here in Texas, who could blame the poor little monster for trying!

Carcass found near Brooklyn Bridge. (Photo by Denise Ginley)

Carcass found near Brooklyn Bridge. (Photo by Denise Ginley)

Carcass found near Brooklyn Bridge. (Photo by Denise Ginley)

Carcass found near Brooklyn Bridge. (Photo by Denise Ginley)

the infamous Montauk Monster (2008)

 

Tags: chupacabra, cryptid, Cryptozoology, crytpozoo, lake monster, montauk monster, River Monsters

Responses to Monstro Bizarro: The Beast of Brooklyn Bridge

  1. FDBK says:

    ” that “this was likely a small dog that drowned and has been floating in the river for quite a while.” ”

    Will there be an official explanation given?

  2. Lyle says:

    I doubt they will provide a final explanation. The city probably picked it up and disposed of it. But you never know…

  3. Trevor T. says:

    I have my doubts as to that other creature being a bloated raccoon. I’ve been chasing the bastards out of my backyard for the past few weeks and, though the idea that one floated down the river to the point of being waterlogged beyond recognition warms this cold, cold heart, I just don’t get the sense that that carcass pictured is one of the masked little buggers in even such a sorry state. And while we’re on the topic, let my field research also note that, despite a lot of talk that raccoons are both mischievous and intelligent, they’re absolutely not. They’re frustratingly dumb, heartbreakingly persistent and a severe pain in the ass, but they are not smart. I wish they’d use their thumbs to hitch a ride somewhere else.

    - T.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>